|
Owing to the fact that this paper is the second in a series there isn’t any other accepted pre-history for this paper, it would be advisable to read the first paper on the fundamental vacuum mechanism first if one has not done so already.
On the Kinematic Properties of the Vacuum in Two Dimensions
The definition of the term ‘inertia’ in this publication is based on the modern usage in terms of the tendency of matter to resist motion, which can be seen by some as an opposite definition as strictly identified in Newton’s three laws.
Inertia as qualified for all classical functions in respect to all known classically derived actions and interactions. In as far as, the exchange principle is defined in the absence of a direct fundamental exchange process. Being determined from the first paper (Link) on the subject ‘On the Kinematic Properties of the Vacuum in Two Dimensions.’ The geometric properties of the vacuum negate the need for a Higg’s Field from the standard model to give mass its innate property of substance and the contemporary Zero-Point fluctuation theory of the vacuum is not required as the derived fundamental source of inertia. In addition, inertia is not determined to be an intrinsic property of mass on its own. Instead, inertia is a variable fictitious natural property bound up in a coupled mechanistic relationship between mass and the quantity of acceleration being imposed on it.
|